Stanford Criminal Justice Center (SCJC)

Overview

The Stanford Criminal Justice Center (SCJC) serves as Stanford's vehicle for promoting and coordinating the study of criminal law and the criminal justice system, including legal and interdisciplinary research, curriculum development, and preparation of law students for careers in criminal law. The center is headed by faculty director Robert Weisberg and executive director Kara Dansky.

SCJC's activities cover areas such as criminal investigation and criminal trial practice and procedure, institutional examination of the police and correctional systems, social science study of the origins and criminal behavior and methods of punishment, and criminal legislation and enforcement in areas ranging from drug crimes to federal white collar crimes.

The center brings legal scholars together with experts from the social sciences, history, and other disciplines on major issues, leading to collective scholarly publications that emanate from these conferences. SCJC also organizes policy forums and strategic roundtables for government officials and nonprofit leaders addressing pragmatic issues of criminal justice reform.

Collaboration within the law school's faculty helps promote multi-student empirical research projects and co-authorship with professors. Reaching beyond SLS, law faculty and students in the program work with other units at Stanford whose work bears on criminal justice issues, including the Center for Comparative Studies in Race and Ethnicity (CCSRE) and the Institute for Research in the Social Sciences (IRiSS).

Together with the law students' Criminal Law Society, SCJC provides an advisory panel of alumni and others who practice criminal law or work in criminal law policy to serve as career planning mentors and advisors. Regular presentations are held wherein prominent criminal lawyers from all parts of the criminal justice system educate students about opportunities and strategies for succeeding in criminal law careers.

In alliance with the Clinical Education Program and Public Interest Programs at Stanford Law School, SCJC supervises and places students in outstanding externships in prosecution and defense agencies, as well as holds trial and appellate-based clinical courses focused on criminal justice reform.



Sentencing and Corrections Policy Project

The Stanford Executive Sessions on Sentencing and Corrections

The Stanford Executive Sessions on Sentencing and Corrections is an innovative form of policy working group designed to bring together the key public, academic, and organizational leaders in the field of criminal justice policy in a spirit of cooperative movement toward reform of the sentencing and corrections systems, as well as the criminal justice system as a whole, in California. During the 2007 phase of the Executive Sessions we held a series of theoretical and analytical discussions on four topics pertinent to state sentencing and corrections policy generally: the possibility of creating a sentencing commission for the state of California, the history of state-local partnerships in the field of sentencing and corrections, the role of the judiciary in developing sentencing policy, and data integration in the state-wide criminal justice system. For the 2008 phase of the Executive Sessions, we have narrowed our focus to center on ways in which information exchanges in criminal justice at the county level can inform public policy. Specifically, our mission in the 2008 Executive Sessions is to encourage collaborative criminal justice policy development by: promoting public/private partnerships with state, county, and municipal governments in the criminal justice arena; creating opportunities for the use of social science research to aid in the development and implementation of empirically-validated, data-driven criminal justice programs and policies; and serving as a public service consultant to the State of California and its fifty-eight counties.

 

The California Sentencing Commission: Laying the Groundwork. Report and Recommendations

California Corrections Reform: State/Local Partnerships. Findings and Analysis

The Role of the Judiciary in Shaping Sentencing Law and Policy. Report and Analysis.

Coordination at the Front-End of Sentencing: The Judiciary, Probation, and the Pre-Sentencing Report.

Partnership with the Little Hoover Commission's study on Sentencing Reform

 

The Stanford Criminal Justice Center is partnering with the Little Hoover Commission on its Sentencing Reform study, which represents a complete review of the opportunities for sentencing reform in California within the broader context of the State's correctional policies.  As part of this study, the Commission will assess the role of sentencing reform as an element of overall correctional system reform including parole and prison reforms, and the importance of a "holistic" approach to reform policy.  The Criminal Justice Center's Executive Director testified before the Commission at its public hearing on August 24, 2006.  View a copy of the report submitted in preparation for that hearing. The Criminal Justice Center is currently preparing a report for the Commission on the history of amendments to California's sentencing system.

  

California Sentencing & Corrections Policy Series

Dr. Joan Petersilia, a Visiting Professor of Law, taught a Stanford Law School class entitled, "Crime and Punishment Policy: Reforming California Corrections" during the fall semester 2005. This course offered students a unique opportunity to learn about California's historic attempt to reform its juvenile and adult corrections system. The students heard from many speakers, including the Director of Corrections, the Director of Juvenile Justice, ex-convicts, victims, families of prisoners, advocacy groups, and other researchers. Each student was required to choose a research topic for their term papers. Some of these student term papers, along with Dr. Petersilia course syllabus, have been placed on Stanford's Criminal Justice Center website in the hopes that they may be useful in the reform efforts.

Working Papers

Criminal Sentencing
Adult Prisons
Probation and Parole

Criminal Sentencing

Hindsight and the Failure of California's Uniform Determinative Sentencing Act
by Emily de Ayora (2006)
Felon Disenfranchisement
by Timothy Bender (2006)
Creating and Passing a Successful Sentencing Commission in California: An Examination of Failed Attempts in California and Successful Sentencing Commissions Across the Country
by Lauren E. Geissler
The End Of Determinate Sentencing: How California's Prison Problem Can Be Solved With Quick Fixes and A Long Term Commission
by Sean Hayes (2006)
Felon Reenfranchisement: Political Implications and Potential for Individual Rehabilitative Benefits
by Nancy Leong (2006)

Adult Prisons

Mentally Ill Prisoners in the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation: Strategies for Improving Treatment and Reducing Recidivism
by David Ball (2006)
Prisoners as Parents: The Importance of Strong Parent-Child Relationships During Parental Incarceration
by Katy Califa (2006)
Assessing the CCPOA's Political Influence and its Impact on Efforts to Reform the California Corrections System
by Ben Carrasco (2006)
Legislating from the Bench: Judicial Activism in California and its Increasing Impact on Adult Prison Reform
by Chantale Fiebig
Gangs in California's Prison System: What Can Be Done?
by Davis Forsythe (2006)
Elderly Prisoners Are Literally Dying For Reform
by Tia Gubler (2006)
The Prison Industry Authority
by Michael Hamilton (2005)
Prison Reform and the California Correctional Peace Officers Association
by Danielle A. Holwerda (2006)
A Return to the "World of Work": An Analysis of California's Prison Job Training Programs and Statutory Barriers to Ex-Offender Employment [Note: see Tables]
by Julia Lipez (2005)
Making the Most of California's Correctional Education Reform: A Survey and Suggestions for Further Steps
by Aidan McGlaze
Providing Services to Female Offenders: Policy Perspectives on Sentencing and Parole
by Elizabeth Pederson (2006)
The Privatization of California Correctional Facilities: An Inmate-Centered Approach
Kathryne TafollaYoung (2006)
Prison Privatization: Possibilities and Approaches to the Privatization of Prisoner Security and Services.
by Marc TafollaYoung (2005)
Cost Benefit Analysis of Vocational Training Programs
(On file at the Stanford Criminal Justice Center)
by Nicholas Tuosto (2006)

Probation and Parole

A Survey of Employment Sanctions Imposed Upon Ex-Offenders by California Law [Note: see Tables]
by Jonathan Cantú (2006)
Sex Offender Re-Entry: A Summary and Policy Recommendation on the Current State of the Law in California and How to "Safely" Re-Introduce Sex Offenders Into Oour Communities [Note: see Tables]
by Maaren Alia Choksi (2006)
Controlling Sex Offender Reentry: Jessica’s Law Measures in California [Note: see Tables]
by Jason Peckenpaugh (2006)
Building an Employment Bridge: Making Ex-Offenders Marketable, Getting Employers to the Table, and Increasing the Likelihood of an Employment Connection
by Robert Rodriguez (2005)
The Lynchpin To Parole Reform: A Case Study of Two Parolee Housing Proposals in Redlands, California
by Benjamin Singerman (2005)
Family-Based Re-Entry Programming: A Promising Tool for Reducing Recidivism and Mitigating the Economic and Societal Costs of Incarceration in California
by Rebecca S. Thalberg (2005)

California Sentencing & Corrections Policy Series Stanford Criminal Justice Center Working Paper.

Distributed for Review and Comment only. Do not cite without author's permission.

Please send questions or suggestions to Kara Dansky Executive Director, Stanford Criminal Justice Center.



Library

The Stanford Criminal Justice Center is frequently asked to provide legal analysis for various government and non-profit entities on a broad range of topics related to criminal law and criminal justice policy. Our goal in this endeavor is to offer the best possible legal analysis of the subjects we're asked to comment on, and to remain neutral regarding any related political issues. Please feel free to review some of the reports that we've developed here.

Police Use of Tasers

The Use of Tasers by the Mountain View Police department
Appendix

Federal Sentencing

Press release
Information Letter to the Public
Issue Table of Contents
Introduction to Issue by Professors Weisberg & Miller

Parolee Housing

Possible Legal Issues Concerning the Redlands Proposed Ordinance Regulating Parolee Housing and Sober Living Arrangements

News & Announcements

Faculty

David W. Mills
Senior Lecturer in Law
650 723.3842
Robert Weisberg
Edwin E. Huddleson, Jr. Professor of Law
650 723.0612

Lecturers

Kara P. Dansky
Lecturer in Law
650 724.5786

Affiliated Faculty

Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar
Professor of Law and Deane F. Johnson Faculty Scholar
650 723.9216
George Fisher
Judge John Crown Professor of Law
650 723.2578
Jeffrey L. Fisher
Associate Professor of Law (Teaching)
650 724.7081
Pamela S. Karlan
Kenneth and Harle Montgomery Professor of Public Interest Law
650 725.4851
Lawrence C. Marshall
Professor of Law, David and Stephanie Mills Director of Clinical Education, and Associate Dean for Public Interest and Clinical Education
650 723.7572
Miguel A. Méndez
Adelbert H. Sweet Professor of Law
650 723.0613

Fellows

W. David Ball
Stanford Law School Fellow

Program Contacts

Robert Weisberg
Director
650 723.0612
Kara P. Dansky
Executive Director
650 724.5786

Events

Executive Sessions on Sentencing and Corrections
December 5, 2008 from 8:30 am - 5:00 pm

A policy roundtable hosted by the Stanford Criminal Justice Center.

Recorded & Past Events

September 2008

August 2008

June 2008

March 2008

January 2008

December 2007

September 2007

August 2007

June 2007

April 2007

March 2007

January 2007

November 2006

October 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

Contact Information

Stanford Criminal Justice Center (SCJC)
Stanford Criminal Justice Center
Crown Quadrangle
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305
650 724.5786

Newsletters

Related Links